If smoking is banned in public places such as malls and restaurants, there will be lesser need to use ventilation and this can result to lesser energy consumption and in effect, lesser expense.
Why engage in an activity that will ruin your health and perhaps eventually kill you? They mentioned that this can even lead to increase cases of DUI fatalities since smokers might drive to other places just so they can smoke.
They drive people to smokers to smoke somewhere else. Rules are in place, but allowing smokers and non-smokers in the same you need a noun here is still a dilemma, and we should completely ban this product. Smoking ban is a policy that prohibits smoking in public places like restaurants, workplaces, parks, malls, government offices and schools, among others.
We no longer have this problem and a survey showed that citizens would prefer to ban cigarette sales and help smokers to have a healthier life. Of importance to you college essay Alma Argumentative essays on smoking in public. All steps possible should be taken to discourage tobacco smoking, a potentially hazardous habit which may lead to death.
You are arguing for something different here. Un-enlightened people standing next to the smoker will be increasing their risk of getting cancer tenfold. Smoking bans are common around the world and have been in place for years.
Most of the cigarette butts that are littered all over the place end up the rivers, and in the bellies of fishes and other aquatic creatures. The first point is, in Quebec, the laws forbid smoking in almost every area. With restricting smoking, supporters posit that this can ensure cleanliness is observed in food preparation in restaurants and in the streets.
By restricting the places where smoking is allowed, this can be prevented. The non-smokers have actively placed themselves in the room, presumably, but they have not actively done anything to the smokers in the way that the smokers have actively done something to them.
However, these policies can also have an impact on restaurants, coffee shops, and other places where people love to smoke. The laws that should be passed to ban smoking in public places. Learn why you should read CIE comments Medical studies suggest that smoking can lead to serious health problems for both the person smoking and the person sitting next to him.
It is always a good idea to present a balanced essay which presents both sides of the argument, but you must always make it very clear what your opinion is and which side of the argument you support. Home 9 Pros and Cons of Smoking Bans 9 Pros and Cons of Smoking Bans Smoking bans are laws or policies that prevent people from smoking in workplaces, restaurants, coffee shops, and other kinds of public places.
They improve work productivity. They help protect the health of people. To get an idea on how people are taking smoking bans, here are some of the views expressed by proponents and opponents.
On the other hand, if it is prohibited, employees can be more productive. If smoking is allowed, non-smokers can still inhale the smoke and it can be bothersome for them to smell the smoke.
Because smoking is not allowed in public, people are only allowed to smoke in their homes. They reduce the risk of second-hand smoke. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. If these young people will be exposed to smoking less, they will not be easily tempted to try.
The right to smoke persists only so long as the act of smoking does not conflict with the more basic right of nonsmokers to be free from harm. They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Second-hand smoke, according to experts, can lead to increased risk to emphysema, cardiovascular disorders and respiratory problems.
They help lower healthcare costs. And since health care costs take around 9. The only disadvantage of the ban that comes to mind is that the smoker finds himself unable to exercise his right to choose, his freedom as a democratic citizen, fully.
They take away freedom from people. The argument against a ban on smoking in public places is presented first. Non-smokers who unwittingly inhale "second-hand" smoke are exposed to nicotine and its harmful effects.
It does so by combining with the blood pigment haemoglobin and preventing it from carrying the oxygen it was supposed to. They help lower healthcare costs. Banning Smoking in Public Places Post University Millions of nonsmokers all across the globe are in danger of serious health risks because of smoking, banning smoking in public places is the only rational way to avoid such risk.
The Advantages of Banning Public Cigarette Smoking For a long time now many people have different views about smoking in public places.
Smokers feel it is their right to smoke where and when they want. ArrayCategory: Argumentative Persuasive Example Essays; Title: It's Time to Ban Smoking in Public Places.
By banning smoking in all public areas, the government shows support for the fact that smoking is bad, and it helps to set changes to the mind set in people reminding them that smoking is not a healthy habit.
Although they are equipped with the knowledge of how unhealthy smoking. "It's Time to Ban. This is a ban smoking in public places essay. It is an example of an essay where you have to give your opinion as to whether you agree or disagree. The sample answer shows you how you can present the opposing argument first, that is not your opinion, and then present your opinion in the.
Then a variety of arguments for smoking in public places presented.
The underlying aim of this paper is to provide a moral guide to the formation of a public policy toward smoking behavior. Such a policy, paper will argue, is likely to have as its consequence the elimination of nonsmokers’ exposure to secondhand smoke.
The second last paragraph discusses about the single possible disadvantages of banning smoking in public places. This paragraph is enough to balance the essay and score A Grade.
But you are indeed right that you need to include points from both perspectives in question where there is AND.Download